top of page

Heart Rate Variability



In the world of recovery, a variety of factors need to be in play to understand the transition towards optimal recoverability. At Linked Fit, our key focus with EVERY client is promoting effective and efficient protocols to advance performance. With that said, recovery is never forgotten, as training responses will always be accompanied by a variety of fellow stressors. Each stressor impacts the body differently and can cause a mixture of physiological and psychological reactions.


These reactions can be detrimental to the growth of superior adaptation and also favorable in means of eustress. When the body experiences a stressor, the body is split towards making a decision of protection. Our body's natural instinct is to stay alive! Whether it is from a negative situation such as running from a lion or a positive such as recovering from a weight lifting training session. This article is focused on providing some understanding of heart rate variability, which is a key indicator of internal stressor monitoring. As you continue reading, you'll be provided information on heart rate variability and the variables within each data recording.


Autonomic Nervous System & Stress


Stressful situations will result in an autonomic nervous system response (McCraty & Atkinson, 2012). Although the autonomic nervous system produces sympathetic activity (i.e. fight or flight response), repeated activation over time can lead to allostatic overload. Cortisol is known to the main hormone triggered in stressful situations within the adrenal gland. Cortisol reduces protein breakdown, red blood cell production, yields catabolic physiological processes, and suppresses immunity (Lee et al., 2017). The roles from this unique biomarker have the potential indication to impair the capacity to recover and protein synthesis (Lee et al., 2017). Therefore, it is critical for officers to be resilient when experiencing a stressful situation, by preparing for it, recovering from it, and adapt to the stressor (McCraty & Atkinson, 2012).



Heart Rate Variability


Heart rate variability (HRV) represents the most reliable and quantitative measure of neurocardiac function via the dynamics of the autonomic nervous system (McCraty & Atkinson, 2012; Paul & Garg, 2012). The variability that exists in the heart rate rhythm is an indicator of physiological resiliency and an individual’s capacity to adapt to stressful demands (Andreassi, 1995; Purwandini Sutarto, Abdul Wahab, & Mat Zin, 2012). Therefore, indicating that variation is essential for autonomic nervous system function (Purwandini Sutarto et al., 2012). Greater HRV indicates an optimal interplay between the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems (Lagos et al., 2008; Paul & Garg, 2012). Heart rates can be modified through noise, anxious thinking, breathing, emotions, pressure sensors in arteries, and other physiological and behavioral changes (Lagos et al., 2008; Mackersie Carol & Kearney, 2017; Paul & Garg, 2012).



Time-Domains



There are a variety of methods to evaluate variations in heart rate, time-domain measures are perhaps the simplest (Electrophysiology Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology the North American Society of, 1996). In an electrocardiograph (ECG), the QRS complex is identified with the normal-to-normal (NN) intervals is measured (Electrophysiology Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology the North American Society of, 1996). The variables from the ECG may be analyzed from the entire recording or calculated by utilizing smaller segments of the recorded period (Electrophysiology Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology the North American Society of, 1996). Of the time domain measures, the standard deviation of the NN interval is the simplest variable to measure which is known to reflect all cyclic components responsible for variability in the ECG recording (Electrophysiology Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology the North American Society of, 1996). The rMSSD is a frequently used parameter applied to the indication of parasympathetic cardiac control (Siegrist & Li, 2017). Higher time-domains values reflect the increased domination of sympathetic compared to the parasympathetic nervous system by a triggered stress response (Rodrigues et al., 2018). The NN50 is the number of pairs of adjacent NN intervals differing by more than 50 ms in the recording, while the pNN50 (based upon a percentage) is the NN50 divided by the total numbers of all NN intervals (Electrophysiology Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology the North American Society of, 1996).


Frequency-Domains